It is proven beyond opinion that Robert Tucker’s Corribee design is a true classic of the British boat building golden age. The design has proven itself time and time again, and even to this day remains an incredibly popular boat. Indeed, Mr Tucker had many great design to his name, including the circumnavigating 19ft Caprice. It is certain that in the 1960’s and 70’s, Britain was one of, if not the, world leader in yacht design.
Sadly, this pioneering attitude doesn’t seem to have made it to the factory floor of some boatyards. When I had Vreli, my Tyler’s Cinder 22, I thought it was home finished because of the diabolical quality of the interior (not just beautifying trim, but bulkheads and other important structural areas), but having since found a few pictures of the factory finished models, I’m starting to wonder if it was indeed home finish at all.
My own Corribee has revealed faults too. In 2009 I was sailing off the Norfolk coast and was shocked to experience hideously loud bangs which sent equally violent shudders through the boat. A subsequent investigation revealed the lead ingot ballast was free to flop three inches from side to side in the encapsulated starboard keel. It had been as such since it left the factory at Newbridge.
Of course, these small boats where made to a price point, and because of that I don’t expect Halberg Rassy quality finish, but it seems that some of these British boatyards (at least Newbridge and Tylers) employed either incompetent, or more likely, lazy staff.
Take my latest discovery, for example.

The wooden pad under the mast compression post had gone a bit soft, so I set about replacing it. In doing so, I lifted the cabin sole boards, and while they were off I noticed the floors were all wobbly. Using ONLY my hands, and anybody who’s met me will agree I’m not the most powerfully built of chaps, I pulled them all off the hull.
The floors were held to the hull with two single layer pieces of roving. This is a pathetically weak construction at the best of times, but whoever put my boat together seems to have been particularly apathetic on that day, because as you can see in the picture above, it wasn’t even wetted properly. There’s bone dry roving there! Considering these men were supposed to be competent craftsmen, using a material that by 1976 was very well understood, I cannot believe for one moment that whoever was doing this job didn’t notice that what he’d done was entirely faulty. This is not once piece of roving, they were all poorly bonded. I should have not been able to pull the floors off the hull at all, even with just a single layer of properly wetted fibreglass.
Fortunately, both Tyler’s and Newbridge seem to have been very competent at moulding the hulls, but if this was the quality of work after that process, I must say it’s little wonder that both Newbridge and Tyler’s eventually went out of business.
I hope the few British builders that are left in business employ less bone idle staff.


Sorry to hear that you’ve got another addition to your to-do list.
I do think it’s kinda cool though – a bit of floating 20th century industrial archaeology!
haha. I suppose one could look at it like that. There might be a Timeteam spoof coming to a youtube near you!
“Look, Tony, I found another bodge!”
Sheesh, give the world a break. You’re sailing a cheap, 30 something year old boat with an unknown maintenance history, and you expect new Hallberg Rassy build quality? Get real.
Maintenance has nothing to do with not building it properly in the first place. As for the other comment, I take it you didn’t read all the post?
“Of course, these small boats where made to a price point, and because of that I don’t expect Halberg Rassy quality finish”
Good you found this poor workmanship and can can fix it now. You mentioned many posts ago that you had a small leak at one of the bilge keels. Hope you can give that good attention too. Would be bad to strike something and discover a huge hole…
I am amazed reading your blog the skills you possess. Did you have these prior to getting the boat or have they been nurtured through doing the jobs on her?
@Druncan
I believe you failed to read this part of the article.
“Of course, these small boats where made to a price point, and because of that I don’t expect Halberg Rassy quality finish, but it seems that some of these British boatyards (at least Newbridge and Tylers) employed either incompetent, or more likely, lazy staff.”
Tip for you…. learn to read, and you won’t look as much of a fool
@ Druncan
Why make nasty useless comments on this blog? Kudu obviously means a lot to Nathan. I myself have an old Tucker caprice that isn’t worth a lot of money, but I still think she is a great little boat.
Why are you reading the blog of a 30 year old boat when you have nothing positive to say ? Fortunately you appear to be in a tiny minority of people who post comments on this blog.
This is a great little website, no place for arguements. Build quality is the same world wide on 20-30yo boats. My 20′t/s was built to Lloyds standards but has faults. Frustrating of course but manageable.
Press on….etc
Will