It’s Vree day!

January 25th, 2011 by admin 7 comments »

Please read this post. It could make all the difference to the future travels of Kudu.

Mr Vee, the very forward thinking wind vane manufacturers, have released a new product. It’s called the Y&B, which stands for yellow and black, and although there’s no official explanation as to why, I presume it’s down to the fact that it’s made of carbon fibre and fibre glass. It weighs 10.5kg, making it by far the lightest self steering system on the market.

Anyway, to cut to the chase, Mr Vee decided to promote their new product with a competition to win one of these new wind vanes. The task was to produce a video on the theme of yellow and black, which was no more than one and a half minutes long. The videos would then be opened to public voting, and the winner gets a self steering system.

Your support. Please please please please. :)

The voting opened today, and it closes on the 30th Jan. Your vote could help me win this system, and with a wind vane on the back of Kudu, I can really go places, and continue to write about, and film it.

If you have a spare 5 minutes, please register with Mr Vee here and once you’re signed up, vote for a video (hopefully mine, but that’s your choice) at the bottom of this page.

Mr Vane is not the kind of company that will spam you, so don’t worry about junk emails. They also make some amazing products, and as you can see from the website, they have a very personal approach to the business of sailing.

As a bonus, everybody who votes will be entered in to a draw to win some LED lighting.

Please vote. There’s absolutely no chance I can afford to buy a self steering system this year, so winning this would make a huge difference to me.

Thank you,

Nathan

Cheaper charts

January 23rd, 2011 by admin 2 comments »

I’ve just discovered that Amazon do nautical charts, and they’re cheaper than the chandlers shops.

New charts are a couple of quid cheaper (as well as having free delivery) and most of the charts have even cheaper alternatives if you don’t mind buying second hand. Bonus.

Anyway, if you’re in need of some charts for the coming season, have a butchers here.

It all comes with the added bonus of giving the Kudu project a tiny (I made £40 in the whole of 2010) bit of commission, which is very much welcome at the moment. Not that that’s why I have drawn you attention to this; I just thought I pass on my new found money saving tip.

Rudder calculations

January 22nd, 2011 by admin 4 comments »

You’d think a rudder was quite a simple thing, wouldn’t you? Just a plank of wood that directs the flow of water one way or another and invokes a turning moment in the boat, but no. It turns out, there’s science behind these planks of wood.

Here is the rudder that was on Kudu when I bought her, and the rudder than got me up the East coast of Britain.

rudderdesign1

Please excuse my crude drawing.

My calculations so far as follows. I’m new to this, and haven’t needed to do this sort of maths since I was in school, so I’m rather rusty. Please do feel free to correct me if you see an error.

According to the formula for working out the surface area of a trapezoid ( A = 1/2(42+54) x 49 ), this entire rudder has a surface area of 2352 cm2.

The area forward of the rudder line of the rudder shaft, or the balance are, is 588cm2, or 25%.

Now, for the proposed new rudder I’m follow the advice of the good people on the YBW forums, who suggest that the balance area should be between 18 and 15%, the latter offering more feedback to the helm.

I want (I think) to keep the surface area of the rudder the same, but increase depth where possible, so a rudder shape more like the following seems reasonable.

rudderdesign2

53cm is the maximum depth of the rudder, which is limited by the draft of the keels, so based on a = h x w (the surface area calculation for a rectangle), I can work out the width, or chord. 2352 = 53 x W. Oh gosh, I feel clumsy doing this.

Ok, W is, by my reckoning, 44cm, which doesn’t give me the shape I was after really, since it’s closer to a square, and doesn’t allow for a hydrofoil profile. At least not NACA12, since the rudder would have to be incredibly thick.

What to do?

Rudder trouble

January 21st, 2011 by admin 7 comments »

When I bought Kudu, the rudder was in a sorry state. Parts of it were softening, and the whole affair had developed a slight twist, and the design itself left much to be desired. It was simply a flat sheet of ply, circa 18mm thick.

Since I was all but clueless about such things back in 2008, I “fixed” the small rotten patches by cutting them out and filling it with wood filler, then laminating the entire rudder with polyester resin and a layer of roving. It wasn’t a neat job, but it strengthened the rudder and was, in my opinion, sea worthy.

When I actually got to sailing Kudu in fresh conditions, I found she had a lot of weather helm above 25knots (of, wind, of course). I now believe that was mainly down to sail trim, in particular the main needs a third reed adding to it, but the rudder certainly had some helping hand in the problem.

I am no hydrodynamicist, but I have done enough research in this area to know that a flat board of plywood makes for a very inefficient rudder. Introducing an angle of attack in relation to the water flow (i.e. steering the boat, or countering weather helm) creates a lot of turbulence on the downstream side of the rudder. If you increase the angle of attack sufficiently the rudder will stall, and then become a brake rather and a steering device.

The solution is to create a hydrofoil profile to the rudder, which will not only stop the rudder stalling (at least anywhere near as soon), but it will increase it’s efficiency since it works along the same principle as an aircraft wing. The hydrofoil shape causes water to flow more quickly over the downstream side of the rudder, which according to Bernoulli’s principle induces a lower pressure relative to the upstream side, and thus lift, which pulls at the rudder and makes the whole affair of turning a much more efficient one.

The trouble is, I have no idea what dimensions this new rudder should have. If I get it wrong, it will really make a mess of the way Kudu sails, and use up a lot of expensive wood and epoxy to boot.

Luckily, there’s a MK1 Corribee on brokerage at Preston at the moment, so I popped along with a big sheet of card and cut myself a template of its rudder. Alas, the Corribee on brokerage is fin keel, and it seems that the rudder is somewhat deeper than whatever should be on the bilge keel version, because it’s too deep to fit on Kudu.

The other potential issue with it, is that it’s entirely unbalanced. This might be ok on the fin keel boat, but I suspect it will be far too heavy with my bilge keels.

I’m now back to square one. I need to make a new rudder for Kudu, but I have no idea where to start.

Any help, of the non guessing sort please, would be very, very much appreciated.

NB: Here the rudder as it was in 2008 before I’d moved aboard.

New floors

January 19th, 2011 by admin 3 comments »

Following from my previous post regarding the quality of workmanship at the Newbridge yard (here), I’ve now sorted the problem.

Kudu now has new floors, cut from 18mm marine ply (doubled up on the forward floor to match the previous piece).

woodwork

The doubled piece was bonded together using some magic 5 minute glue. It’s “safe for immersion in saltwater”, and dead strong. Within 5 minutes it sets, and after about 20 minutes, or a brew in the cafe, it’s ready for using.

corribee-floors

Job done. Well, almost. Epoxy takes a while longer to “go off” than polyester, but forms a much better bond, especially for areas that likely to be wet. The downside is I’m stuck near the companionway until it does harden (24 hours in theory, but it should be strong enough to withstand accidental taps in a few hours). The good news about West Systems epoxy is that it doesn’t smell anywhere near as bad as polyester resin.

I prepared the area with course sandpaper (and a sander), then cleaned it with acetone which most certainly does smell (quite nice in my opinion, but perhaps that’s echoes of a misspent youth). The floors have been bonded with two layers of 50mm tape in four places. This is twice the amount used by Newbridge, and epoxy is stronger to boot, so it should be ok, although I might mix up another pot and add a couple more layers depending on how it feels tomorrow. Epoxy is far too expensive to waste willy nilly, you know!

Anyway, that’s it. Job done, but although I’ve spent a day on it, I’ve got no further in overall progress. I suppose I have now got a much better “canvass” for installing the bilge pump in to though.

British workmanship

January 18th, 2011 by admin 10 comments »

It is proven beyond opinion that Robert Tucker’s Corribee design is a true classic of the British boat building golden age. The design has proven itself time and time again, and even to this day remains an incredibly popular boat. Indeed, Mr Tucker had many great design to his name, including the circumnavigating 19ft Caprice. It is certain that in the 1960’s and 70’s, Britain was one of, if not the, world leader in yacht design.

Sadly, this pioneering attitude doesn’t seem to have made it to the factory floor of some boatyards. When I had Vreli, my Tyler’s Cinder 22, I thought it was home finished because of the diabolical quality of the interior (not just beautifying trim, but bulkheads and other important structural areas), but having since found a few pictures of the factory finished models, I’m starting to wonder if it was indeed home finish at all.

My own Corribee has revealed faults too. In 2009 I was sailing off the Norfolk coast and was shocked to experience hideously loud bangs which sent equally violent shudders through the boat. A subsequent investigation revealed the lead ingot ballast was free to flop three inches from side to side in the encapsulated starboard keel. It had been as such since it left the factory at Newbridge.

Of course, these small boats where made to a price point, and because of that I don’t expect Halberg Rassy quality finish, but it seems that some of these British boatyards (at least Newbridge and Tylers) employed either incompetent, or more likely, lazy staff.

Take my latest discovery, for example.

floor-bonding

The wooden pad under the mast compression post had gone a bit soft, so I set about replacing it. In doing so, I lifted the cabin sole boards, and while they were off I noticed the floors were all wobbly. Using ONLY my hands, and anybody who’s met me will agree I’m not the most powerfully built of chaps, I pulled them all off the hull.

The floors were held to the hull with two single layer pieces of roving. This is a pathetically weak construction at the best of times, but whoever put my boat together seems to have been particularly apathetic on that day, because as you can see in the picture above, it wasn’t even wetted properly. There’s bone dry roving there! Considering these men were supposed to be competent craftsmen, using a material that by 1976 was very well understood, I cannot believe for one moment that whoever was doing this job didn’t notice that what he’d done was entirely faulty. This is not once piece of roving, they were all poorly bonded. I should have not been able to pull the floors off the hull at all, even with just a single layer of properly wetted fibreglass.

Fortunately, both Tyler’s and Newbridge seem to have been very competent at moulding the hulls, but if this was the quality of work after that process, I must say it’s little wonder that both Newbridge and Tyler’s eventually went out of business.

I hope the few British builders that are left in business employ less bone idle staff.

Bilge Pump: The final solution

January 18th, 2011 by admin 5 comments »

Right, it’s done. I’ve decided, and about time to since onkudu.com was turning in to a blog about nothing other than bilge pumps.

The previous “solution” I posted (here) was perhaps a moment of madness. While I could have got it to work, it was a complete mess of a job and served no place on a seagoing boat. Still, trying it, and seeing it, meant I could at least rule it out.

In the end, I’ve gone with what Ben suggested (see comments on this post), and put the pumps in tandem.

I initially dismissed that idea since it would mean a reduction in the size of the pick-up pipe for the manual pump: The manual pump uses inch (25mm) pipe, where as the electric pump uses 3/4 inch (19mm). I didn’t want a reduction because it would obviously hinder the flow of water, but having thought about it further, I’ve come to the conclusion that if 1/4 of an inch is going to make any sort of difference to a sinking boat, it will only be in the small amount of extra time spent afloat.

So, from bilge to seacock, the system now looks like this

  1. Whale Supersub 500 (35 litres per minute)
  2. 19mm pipe
  3. Non-return valve, which also converts from 19mm to 25mm
  4. hand bilge pump
  5. 25mm pipe to 25mm seacock exit via ball valve.

Kudu’s bilges are usually bone dry, so if this system is ever needed, I’m in trouble (or I fell asleep with the hatch open).

I just need to fit it all now, and before I can do that, I need to cut a new floor and bond it to the hull. Whoever fitted the original floor at Newbridge didn’t do a very good job with wetting the matting, and it didn’t pass Whitworth standards so I’ve removed it (I tapped it with a boot toe!).

Possible bilge solution

January 18th, 2011 by admin 6 comments »

It is a very handy thing to have a good relationship with your local chandlers.

I’ve just borrowed various bronze fittings to see if I can make up a solution to my bilge pump issue. If it’s workable, I buy what I need.

So, here it is…

seacock

So, in theory it’s ok but there are three problems.

  • I don’t like all that heavy metal clinging on to the seacock. It just seems like a poor job.
  • It creates a loop, so I’d need to fit non-return valves on each outlet to prevent pump straight back in to the bilges.
  • To get the various fittings lines up, I can’t tighten them fully. I’m not plumber, but I’m guessing PTFE tape will sort this problem out?

What’s the verdict? I’m not ever so convinced. I might have a go at arc welding two bits of pipe together to make a much lighter t-piece out of stainless. I’ve still got the loop issue though, and no matter what solution I go for I think I’m going to need the non return valves.

More jobs done (in pictures)

January 17th, 2011 by admin 2 comments »

The standard gimbals for the Origo Stoves are a bit naff and despite costing over £60, are not much good for mounting the stove in a small boat. They seem to have been designed to mount the Origo 3000 in place of  a full size oven. Since I imagine people buying the Origo 1500, or 3000 will not have the space for a full size oven, I really think Origo should offer a more suitable option to their customers. Perhaps I’m wrong; feedback appreciate.

Anyway, I decided I could do a better job, so set about butchering the £60 gimbals with an angle grinder, and making my own with the addition of a bit of Sapele.

Stove gimbals

Here you can see the two gimbals.

Origo custom gimbal

One side mounted in place using five screws.

Origo 3000

And the finished job.

I’ve also started making the new companionway step, which also serves as a cover for the sink. It was cut out of 18mm marine ply.

Corribee companionway step

And I came up with a nifty little design for it. The mixer tap you can see in the picture above, tends to drip a little. It’s not because of any leak per se, but as the water that remains in the tap neck dribbles out after switching the tap off. Also, I wanted to have some protection just in case it it got kicked on by accident, so I came up with this…

Tap drip catcher

This is obviously not finished, but it will be smoothed off, and a hole drilled in the bottom of the “pit”, which then allows any stray water to run along a small routed conduit underneath the step, and drip harmlessly in to the sink.

It’s just a small touch, but worth doing I felt.

Oliver’s Travels

January 16th, 2011 by admin 3 comments »

Although I couldn’t get to the London Boat Show this year, those of you that did might have seen Oliver Rofix. He’s a 25 year old planning on sailing around the UK this year, but unlike me, he’s planned it properly and is raising money for something which has directly affected him.

In 2005 he was diagnosed with a rare form of Leukaemia, but with a lot of support from various establishments, and I should think an unimaginable amount of determination from himself, he pulled through after a bone marrow transplant and lots of chemotherapy.

Oliver has since done an outstanding job of refitting his 18ft boat, and on the 2nd May (oddly that’s exactly two years after I went for a wonder up the coast), he’s setting off on a round Britain sail to raise support for the Anthony Nolan Trust.

Please show him your support if you can. I know there’s constantly a stream of people raising money for various charities, and it seems that sailing around Blighty is all too common (although I assure you it’s not an easy venture, by a very long way), but this bloke has fought a battle against odds and pains that I certainly can’t begin to imagine, and I think he deserves some respect and support for coming through it with the determination not only to live his own life to the full, but to try and give more people the chance of doing so.

Oliver’s site is here, and I’d suggest reading this page; I’m not the most emotional of chaps, it must be said, but even I had to wipe a tear after reading that.

www.olivers-travels.co.uk